Skip to main content

Rebuilding to heal: Sandy Hook Elementary School

December 14, 2012. A 20-year-old gunman named Adam Lanza invaded the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut and fatally shot 20 children, ages six and seven, and six adult staff members. Following that horrific event, the town of Newtown decided to build a new, 87,000-sf PreK-4 school, which required extreme sensitivity by the Building Team that worked hand and hand with the town on every aspect of the building’s planning, design, and construction.

On the recommendation of owner’s rep, STV|DPM, the school’s Public Building and Site Commission assembled the project team before planning began. The architects collaborated with more than 50 participants of the project’s programming committee. The Building Team also worked with teachers and parents to develop workshops to inform young children about the project’s design, engineering, and construction. 

The Building Team went to great lengths to assuage a still-grieving community during the design and construction for this school. That included training sessions for subcontractors to reinforce the sensitive nature of this project. Robert Benson Photography.

To respect the community, the construction process closed off the site to gawkers, limited photography, and accommodated project tours for school staff members, families of survivors, and teachers. Construction manager Consigli hosted two subcontractor events to raise awareness among the trades about the project’s requirements.

The new school’s striking design emphasizes outdoor activities. Footbridges recall the geology of Newtown’s watercourses. The building’s largest central courtyard—overlooked by two small breakout spaces imagined as tree houses—is landscaped with two amphitheater-style classroom spaces for outdoor learning. The building’s light-filled main lobby includes a two-story wall of clear and colored glass and overhead corridor bridge, with nearby artwork evoking nature.

This finished product emphasizes outdoor activities and includes an overhead corridor bridge. Robert Benson Photography.

Building Team – Submitting firm, architect Svigals + Partners Owner Town of Newtown, Conn. Interior architect Lynn Brotman Interior Design Structural engineer Michael Horton Associates MEP BVH Integrated Services CM Consigli Constrution Owner’s representative STV|DPM

General Information – Size 87,160 sf Cost $39.8 million Construction time October 2014 to July 2016 Delivery method CM at risk

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Construction disputes were slightly less contentious last year

The resolution of global construction disputes remained steady in 2016, and the average time it took to resolve those disputes declined  bit, according to the seventh annual Arcadis Global Construction Disputes Report 2017, which is subtitled “Avoiding the Same Pitfalls.” This report reflects the construction disputes that Arcadis’ team handled around the world. The report infers that the roadblocks to expeditious and less cost dispute resolution often stem from the need for better contract administration, robust documentation, and a proactive approach to risk management. “Our industry contains the best problem solvers in the world,” the report states. “But there often seems to be a lack of ability or willingness of the project participants to compromise and resolve disputes at the earliest and most inexpensive stage possible.” Roy Cooper, Senior Vice President of Arcadis Contract Solutions, attributes disputes to “human emotions that can impede settlements, as they do with phys...

Quick turnaround: Partners HealtchCare

This administrative building, the largest in Somerville, Mass., consolidates 4,500 employees from 14 locations across Boston into one place. The project’s 30-month schedule was half of the typical time frame for such a building. So the Building Team had little margin for delays or mistakes. Twice-weekly meetings that included the client, AEC firms, and consultants were guided by seven core values that served as a roadmap during the design process. Once construction began, project leaders established a risk assessment group that identified and assessed potential problems weekly.  The building creates an “all-under-one-roof” organizational concept and culture, with a training center, multipurpose auditorium (available for use by campus residents, the local community, and the Partners’ network), community hubs, and outdoor spaces that include two acres of green space and walking paths. The facility is near a new subway stop, which connects the building to Somerville’s developing mix...

Green building advocates erect icehouses on Penn. state capitol steps to make point on codes

Advocates aiming to prompt Pennsylvania legislators to update the state’s building codes erected two icehouses on the steps of the state Capitol in Harrisburg to make a point about energy efficiency. One 8-foot-by-8-foot icehouse was built to current code; the other was built to passive house energy efficiency standards. In about three weeks, the project’s designers expect that the half-ton of ice in the less efficient shed will have melted completely, while the block in the high-performance building will still be about half of its original size. Pennsylvania has not updated its energy codes since 2009. Advocates also want state lawmakers to reform the process for adopting new codes. The Senate and House passed bills this spring to revise the state’s building code adoption process. A 2011 law requires an advisory board to approve each code change with a two-thirds vote. Interesting read originally from BDC Network